A bounded question
Frame the inquiry so different answers would lead to different decisions. Avoid studying a broad theme without a purpose.
Early ideas benefit from a small enough question to investigate. The research perspective looks for the uncertainty that matters, the simplest way to learn about it and the decision that would change when the evidence arrives.
A prototype does not need to imitate an entire finished product to be useful. It can make one assumption visible or reveal that the original question needs to change. NRTH Labs connects that way of working to the technical and industrial contexts around the company.
Open a context to see the connections it brings into focus.
A research inquiry moves from a question through assumptions and an experiment to evidence and a decision, with room to revisit the question.
Context in viewAn idea contains too many unknowns
A map of the questions around the work. It illustrates relationships rather than a live service or an existing product integration.
A concept is interesting, but discussing the whole thing at once makes it difficult to decide what should be investigated first.
Choose the assumption whose answer would most change the next commitment.
Write one testable question and name the decision it supports. That gives an early study a clear purpose.
There is a desire to make something tangible, but building every part of the concept would obscure the uncertainty the prototype is meant to address.
Design the smallest experiment that can distinguish between the plausible answers.
A focused prototype earns its complexity. Include the pieces needed to answer the question, and record what it does not establish.
A study reveals a limitation, an unexpected observation or a reason to reconsider the initial assumption.
Keep the evidence and its conditions attached to the next decision, even when the original idea is put aside.
Learning remains valuable when it is recorded clearly enough to revisit. A changed question can be a useful outcome.
Frame the inquiry so different answers would lead to different decisions. Avoid studying a broad theme without a purpose.
Keep the conditions that matter and leave out the ones that do not. Explain what the study is capable of establishing.
Record observations separately from interpretation. A useful result includes its uncertainty and the circumstances in which it arose.
Continuing, reframing and putting an idea aside are all possible decisions. The value lies in making that choice with better information.
These venture directions bring distinct perspectives to research questions. Their relationship is a way to frame the conversation; current scope is confirmed separately.
Focuses on assumptions, prototypes and the evidence needed to make an early possibility concrete enough to discuss.
Explore the ventureIntroduces questions about software boundaries, interaction and how a technical idea would fit real work.
Explore the ventureIntroduces the intended application, operating conditions and technical expertise around a material question.
Explore the ventureIntroduces questions about comprehension, access and the circumstances in which a person encounters information.
Explore the ventureIt describes NRTH’s approach to early questions and experimentation. The visual studies elsewhere on the website are creative demonstrations. Any technical or scientific result would require its own methods, evidence and stated limits.
Yes. Explain the question, why its answer matters, what is already known and the context in which a study would need to be useful. Scope and any collaboration arrangement are discussed separately.
The main Research page includes a visual study of form, structure and perspective. It is a way to explore the design system, rather than a simulation of a commercial or scientific process.
A possibility you see.
A problem worth solving.
We would like to hear it.